Lolireef v.9002

Full Version: Post your Desktop
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
[Image: archbook.png]

I recently put my netbook back on Arch, it's gotten quite a lot of changes recently:

the HDD died, so I put a 32GB OCZ SSD in, which is actually sufficient:

Code:
[seanieb@lithium ~]$ df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs           30G  5.0G   23G  18% /
shm             999M  1.2M  998M   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda2       114M   42M   67M  39% /boot
none            512M   52K  512M   1% /tmp
/dev/sdb1       233G   17G  217G   7% /media/EXTERNAL

I have the replacement HDD from WDC in an external, I have tmp loaded into RAMFS to reduce unnessicary writes to the SSD.

I'm using GNOME 3 with all the extras (lol lazy mode) and a quite usable set of programs. (you can see the most used ones on the top) and I'm really quite impressed with Gnome 3.

It reminds me a lot of Mac OS, and I think that's why I like it a lot. Nevertheless I did a lot of Shell Extension based tweaking and ended up with this configuration, including a unified menu bar configuration.

I'm also using the Atom CK patchset but I'm not sure if it's making the battery life worse or not.
ramfs, huh?
I'll check the archwiki, this definitely sounds useful. I could use it as temp space for uncompressed files and /tmp stuff.

EDIT: ramfs doesn't have any actual limits set, though... Which means I could run out of memory. tmpfs on the other hand supports it, but reduces performance gain. Ugh...
(12-25-2011 10:52 AM)Remilia Wrote: [ -> ]ramfs, huh?
I'll check the archwiki, this definitely sounds useful. I could use it as temp space for uncompressed files and /tmp stuff.

EDIT: ramfs doesn't have any actual limits set, though... Which means I could run out of memory. tmpfs on the other hand supports it, but reduces performance gain. Ugh...

You can make your own ramfs' and mount them in the fstab with hard limits just like tmpfs.
Is that so? From what I've read, ramfs will still use available ram even if the limit is exceeded.
And here's the machine that I've pretty much had since late october but haven't gotten around to taking any post your desktop's of :P

[Image: 21mrlll.png]
ATI Radeon HD 6770 1GB
AMD Phenom II B60 X4 @ 3.3Ghz
8GB DDR3 RAM
Windows 7 x64

Pretty damn good for $500.

And before anyone complains about monitor resolution, I basically bought the better quality 19" samsung monitor instead of the crappy quality 22" unknown brand monitor.
19 inch is fine too.

Nice tidas~
[Image: tidusk.jpg]
Oooh, I like dat top conky.
Care to share the conkyrc? Plasma widgets are nice and all... but I think I can go back to that.
background yes
use_xft yes
xftfont fixed:size=7
xftalpha 1
update_interval 1.0
total_run_times 0
own_window yes
own_window_transparent no
own_window_type normal
own_window_argb_visual yes
own_window_colour 000000
own_window_argb_value 140
own_window_hints undecorated,below,sticky,skip_taskbar,skip_pager
double_buffer yes
minimum_size 1013 8
draw_shades yes
draw_outline yes
draw_borders no
draw_graph_borders no
default_color white
default_shade_color black
default_outline_color black
alignment top_middle
gap_x 0
gap_y 5
no_buffers yes
uppercase no
cpu_avg_samples 2
override_utf8_locale no

TEXT
$nodename $uptime | RAM: $mem/$memmax | CPU: ${execi 1 sensors | grep 'Core 0' | cut -c16-18}C ${freq_g}GHz ${cpu cpu0}%/${cpu cpu1}%$alignr/: ${fs_used /}/${fs_size /} /home: ${fs_used /home}/${fs_size /home} | Battery: ${battery} ${battery_time}
Thank you~
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Reference URL's